It's the discussion about the reaction of some people in the UK regarding their impending social media ban for under 16s that bugged me most. Most noteably was the hand-waving around "the gov is just trying to siphon up all our IDs" and "this means everyone will have to show ID, not just under 16s". If only there was another precedent somewhere in the world where precisely this model was rolled... oh - wait! 🐨 The way the ban (sorry - "delay") has been done in Australia isn't perfect, but it also doesn't have to be. There are still plenty of under 16s with access so socials, but I do not know of a single adult who had had to show any form of ID or do any age verification whatsoever. So, relax, wait until we know more about how thye're planning to do it (and the UK gov will be closely looking at the Aussie precedent), and then lose your minds if it's done totally differently at the expense of everyone's privacy.
Weekly update- Homepage
- International
- Weekly Update 488
Related
PwC's CISO on AI, Robots & What's Next for Security
9 hours ago
10
NIST: Solo Shouldn't Mean Less Secure
10 hours ago
11
UK Wades Into Tech Sovereignty Amid AI Policy Changes
3 days ago
41
AI Gave Your Incident Archive a Second Job
3 days ago
37
Why Europe's Freezer Hacks Spread So Far, So Fast
3 days ago
43









